{"id":33777,"date":"2026-10-04T14:45:04","date_gmt":"2026-10-04T11:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/console-classics.com\/?p=33777"},"modified":"2026-10-04T14:45:06","modified_gmt":"2026-10-04T11:45:06","slug":"egm-book-delays-after-1-8-million-egm-explains-the-long-wait","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/console-classics.com\/ru\/retrogaming\/egm-book-delays-after-1-8-million-egm-explains-the-long-wait\/","title":{"rendered":"EGM Book Delays: After $1.8 Million, EGM Explains the Long Wait"},"content":{"rendered":"

EGM book delays have frustrated thousands of backers. After raising $1.8 million, EGM Media says printer problems caused the latest setback.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n Electronic Gaming Monthly Compendium cover and promotional artwork
Electronic Gaming Monthly Compendium cover and promotional artwork<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

A Huge Kickstarter Success Turns Into a Long Wait<\/h2>\n

The project began with the sort of momentum that makes retro-magazine fans sit up straight. Announced in 2024, the Electronic Gaming Monthly Compendium<\/a> promised a carefully assembled collection of magazine excerpts, fresh commentary, and previously untold stories connected to the history of EGM.<\/p>\n

The campaign didn\u2019t merely reach its target. It smashed the original goal in less than 24 hours and eventually collected approximately $1.8 million from backers. That kind of response suggested that the book would have a clear runway from crowdfunding success to printing press.<\/p>\n

Reality, unfortunately, has been much less tidy.<\/p>\n

The digital edition was delivered in December of the previous year, giving supporters at least one piece of the promised package. The physical book, however, remained absent. A July 8, 2026 update indicated that shipping was expected to begin on September 14, 2026. When that date passed without physical orders moving, concern among backers became difficult to ignore.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ll admit, the original pitch made the project sound relatively straightforward: take a celebrated magazine archive, shape it into a substantial book, and send it out to the people who funded it. That impression now seems far too optimistic. A large, multi-part publishing project is clearly more complicated than producing a single magazine issue, especially when packaging and bundled products enter the picture.<\/p>\n

Why the Physical Edition Stalled<\/h2>\n

The latest explanation centers on the printer selected to manufacture the books. EGM Media says it had paid an advance and received a production schedule that appeared acceptable. Soon afterward, however, the printer reportedly informed the team that the agreed printing price would be higher than expected.<\/p>\n

That change brought production to a halt.<\/p>\n

Rather than immediately continue at the increased cost, EGM Media spent time examining alternative printers. The company believed that process would be quick because it had already spoken with other vendors before choosing the original printer. That assumption turned out to be wrong.<\/p>\n

The scale of the project created the real obstacle. This wasn\u2019t only a matter of printing pages and binding a cover. The work also involved packaging and bundling several products together, meaning a replacement supplier needed to handle a much broader operation than a standard book printer.<\/p>\n

After reviewing the available options, EGM Media concluded that staying with the original printer was the fastest path forward. The publisher has now paid the additional amount requested and says production is ready to resume.<\/p>\n

That decision makes practical sense on paper, although it\u2019s understandable that backers may view it with a raised eyebrow. The team spent time investigating alternatives, only to return to the company that created the initial problem. Sometimes the quickest road really is the one you already know\u2014but after such a long silence, that explanation doesn\u2019t erase the frustration.<\/p>\n

The New Production Window<\/h2>\n

EGM Media says the next available printing window is October 16, 2026. The company reportedly plans to provide another update on that date, giving backers a specific point at which they can expect further information.<\/p>\n

That is more useful than another vague promise, but it still isn\u2019t the same thing as a confirmed shipping schedule. Printing is only one stage of the process. Once the books are produced, they still need to be packaged, bundled, and sent to customers.<\/p>\n

For now, the October date should probably be treated as a production milestone rather than a guaranteed arrival date. I\u2019m cautiously hopeful, but uncertain whether the schedule will hold until the first boxes actually leave the warehouse. After all, the project has already shown how quickly a seemingly settled plan can unravel.<\/p>\n

Backers who no longer wish to wait can request a refund through Kickstarter messages. EGM Media says it hopes supporters will allow additional time, while acknowledging that some people may prefer to cancel their pledges instead.<\/p>\n

That refund option matters. Even a loyal backer can reach the point where patience stops feeling like enthusiasm and starts feeling like unpaid project management.<\/p>\n

A Clearer Message About Responsibility<\/h2>\n

The update also addresses the criticism aimed at members of the EGM team. Editorial director Josh Harmon and editor Mollie Patterson have reportedly faced online criticism\u2014and, in some cases, abusive behavior\u2014over the delays.<\/p>\n

EGM Media says neither person is responsible for the ongoing production problems. According to the update, Harmon and Patterson were not involved in the discussions with the printer, did not select the printer, and do not have the authority to speed up manufacturing.<\/p>\n

That distinction is important. It\u2019s easy for disappointed customers to direct frustration toward the most visible names connected to a project, but editorial staff are not automatically responsible for manufacturing, purchasing, or logistics. Holding the right people accountable is part of any honest post-crowdfunding conversation.<\/p>\n

The company has asked backers not to treat Harmon and Patterson as though they caused the delay. The responsibility, it says, belongs with the decisions made by the project\u2019s leadership.<\/p>\n

EGM Admits the Original Assumption Was Wrong<\/h2>\n

The most revealing part of the update is EGM Media\u2019s admission that it underestimated the difficulty of the project.<\/p>\n

The team apparently approached the compendium as though it would be similar to publishing a regular magazine issue\u2014a process it had completed many times before. That comparison made sense at first glance, but a large collector-focused book with multiple products, specialized packaging, and a sizeable fulfillment operation is a different beast.<\/p>\n

A magazine is built around a recurring production rhythm. A major commemorative book is more like assembling a small machine: every part has to fit, and one delayed component can hold up the whole thing.<\/p>\n

EGM Media now says its assumptions were incorrect, that its decisions contributed to the delays, and that too much time was spent trying to complete a complicated process. The company has accepted full responsibility for the current situation and says it remains committed to delivering what was promised.<\/p>\n

That acknowledgment is welcome. It doesn\u2019t replace the missing book, of course, but it is more useful than pretending the setbacks were entirely outside the team\u2019s control. My first reaction to the update was relief that communication had finally resumed. On a second read, though, the relief becomes more guarded: an apology is meaningful, but the next milestone will be measured in printed pages and shipping labels.<\/p>\n

Why Backers Are Still Wary<\/h2>\n

The project has several things working in its favor. The digital edition has already been delivered, the original printer has apparently been retained, the additional cost has reportedly been paid, and a new production window has been identified.<\/p>\n

Still, the timing remains awkward. Backers were previously told that physical orders could begin shipping in September 2026. That did not happen, and the campaign had gone quiet when people asked what was holding everything up.<\/p>\n

The silence is arguably the biggest damage to confidence. Delays happen in publishing, manufacturing, and fulfillment. What makes them harder to accept is the feeling that information only arrives after pressure builds.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s also the question of whether the October 16 window will lead directly to shipping or simply another update. The wording suggests that date is tied to printing, not necessarily delivery. That difference may sound technical, but anyone waiting for a large, expensive physical book knows it can mean several more weeks\u2014or longer.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think it\u2019s fair to declare the project doomed based on this update alone. At the same time, it would be premature to assume everything is fixed. The sensible position is somewhere between optimism and crossed arms.<\/p>\n

A Compendium Still Worth Waiting For?<\/h2>\n

The appeal of the project hasn\u2019t disappeared. EGM occupies a memorable place in gaming history, and a thoughtfully curated compendium could be a wonderful time capsule. Old magazine pages have a particular texture\u2014part documentation, part time machine. A single review excerpt can bring back the era of cartridge blowers, weekend rental decisions, and magazine scores treated as sacred law.<\/p>\n

That nostalgia is precisely why the delays sting. Backers didn\u2019t simply order another product; many supported a celebration of a publication that shaped how people discovered games. When a project carries that emotional weight, the communication needs to be especially careful.<\/p>\n

EGM Media says it understands the importance of the book and will work to bring it across the finish line. The next meaningful test arrives on October 16, when supporters should learn whether the revised production plan is actually moving.<\/p>\n

Until then, patience remains the only available strategy\u2014though it\u2019s safe to say the patience cupboard is getting rather bare.<\/p>\n

\u0421\u0430\u0439\u0442 EGM book<\/a> delays have transformed an exciting archival project into a test of communication, planning, and trust. EGM Media has acknowledged its mistakes, paid the higher printing cost, and provided a new production window. Now the project needs to turn those assurances into a finished book. Would you keep waiting, or would you request a refund after this many setbacks?<\/p>\n

\u0427\u0410\u0421\u0422\u041e \u0417\u0410\u0414\u0410\u0412\u0410\u0415\u041c\u042b\u0415 \u0412\u041e\u041f\u0420\u041e\u0421\u042b<\/h2>\n